In industrial facilities, piping is the circulatory system that keeps operations running. Whether the service is steam, condensate, hydrogen, natural gas, chemicals, glycol, or utilities, piping must be engineered to operate safely under pressure and temperature, integrate properly with connected equipment, and meet code and provincial/state requirements.
Piping engineering focuses on practical, buildable design that supports safe operation, maintainability, and long-term reliability. It includes routing and layout, material selection, flexibility and support philosophy, interface management with equipment and structures, and engineering checks that confirm the system will perform as intended throughout its life.
Poorly engineered piping can create consequences that are expensive and disruptive: unexpected loads on equipment nozzles, vibration and fatigue failures, thermal expansion problems, leaks, rework during installation, and delays during regulator or third-party reviews. Strong piping engineering reduces these risks early, when changes are least costly.
Piping design and layout
Developing routing that is constructible and maintainable, selecting materials and components, defining insulation and heat tracing interfaces, and coordinating with structural and mechanical constraints.
Piping flexibility and stress analysis
Evaluating sustained, thermal expansion, and occasional loads to confirm compliance with the governing code and to protect connected equipment. This includes support locations, anchor and guide strategies, nozzle load checks (as applicable), and practical recommendations to reduce field changes.
Isometrics and fabrication-ready deliverables
Producing accurate isometrics, bill of materials, weld maps (when required), and installation details that support fabrication and construction execution.
Code and regulatory compliance
Confirming alignment with applicable standards such as ASME B31.1, ASME B31.3, ASME B31.9, and project specifications, along with local jurisdictional requirements that vary by province and state.
Jurisdictional expectations and pressure piping registration
In Canada, pressure piping requirements are jurisdiction-driven. Expectations can differ between provinces, even when the same ASME piping code is used as the design basis. For example, Alberta and Ontario have established design submission practices through ABSA and TSSA, respectively, and reviewers typically expect a complete, coherent package that connects the engineering intent to code compliance.
A pressure piping submission commonly requires items such as:
CRN registration applies to pressure-retaining components (such as fittings, valves, flanges, and some assemblies) that are registered for use in Canadian jurisdictions. Piping systems themselves are typically handled through pressure piping design registration requirements rather than CRN, but the two often intersect in real projects.
MECS frequently supports clients where piping stress analysis and regulator-facing documentation must align with registered components and jurisdictional review expectations. When a project includes CRN-registered components (or requires new CRNs for specific items), the piping design and stress review should be consistent with:
MECS Engineering provides piping engineering services that are grounded in real execution and regulator expectations. Our team supports clients across multiple jurisdictions, including projects involving ABSA and TSSA reviews, where completeness, clarity, and code alignment matter as much as the calculations.
MECS support can include:
Piping engineering is not only a design activity; it is risk control. A well-engineered piping system improves safety, reduces downtime, supports reliable operation, and prevents expensive construction rework. With MECS Engineering, clients get practical engineering backed by code knowledge and experience working with jurisdictional expectations.